Spin wave propagation in a ring-shaped magnonic waveguide
Abstract
We experimentally investigate frequency-selective spin wave (SW) transmission in a micrometre-scale, ring-shaped magnonic resonator integrated with a linear Yttrium Iron Garnet (YIG) stripe. Using super-Nyquist-sampling magneto-optical Kerr effect microscopy (SNS-MOKE) and micro-focused Brillouin light scattering (-BLS), we probe SW dynamics in the dipolar regime under in-plane magnetisation. Spatially resolved measurements reveal a sharp transmission peak at 3.92 GHz for an external field of 74 mT, demonstrating strong frequency selectivity.
Our results show that this selectivity arises from scattering and interference between multiple SW modes within the ring. These modes are governed by the anisotropic dispersion relation, transverse mode quantisation due to geometric confinement, and inhomogeneities of the effective magnetic field. In addition, the anisotropy enforces fixed group velocity directions, leading to caustic-like propagation that limits efficient out-coupling. Fourier analysis reveals discrete wavevector components consistent with quantised transverse eigenmodes. Additional -BLS measurements at 70 mT show a shift of the transmission peak, confirming that the filtering characteristics are tunable by external parameters.
I Introduction
Considerable interest has been drawn to the field of magnonics [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6], which aims to study and exploit the properties of spin waves (SWs)—the collective excitations of magnetic moments within a magnetically ordered material. Their potentially nanoscale wavelengths [7] and tunable dispersion relations make SWs attractive for wave-based information processing, where functionalities such as frequency filtering [8, 9] and logic operations [10, 11, 12] can be achieved based on wave interference effects.
Self-interference-based SW filters have gained interest due to their structural simplicity and compatibility with standard fabrication processes. A minimal implementation is a ring-shaped magnonic resonator connected to a waveguide, offering frequency-dependent interference paths without multilayer designs, similar to photonic ring resonators [13]. While several theoretical and simulation studies [14, 15, 16] and some experimental work [17, 18] have explored such structures, spatially resolved observations of SW propagation and interference in micrometre-scale rings have largely been missing.
In this report, we experimentally investigate SW propagation in a micrometre-scale ring-shaped magnonic resonator connected to a yttrium iron garnet (YIG) waveguide using super-Nyquist-sampling magneto-optical Kerr effect (SNS-MOKE) microscopy. Our spatially resolved measurements reveal that multiple transverse width modes and caustic-like directional SWs coexist and interfere within the ring, giving rise to pronounced frequency-selective transmission. Additional micro-focused Brillouin light scattering (-BLS) experiments were performed, confirming that the ring-structure realized a high frequency selectivity. These findings suggest that the inherent complexity of magnonic mode structure can actively enhance the frequency selectivity of self-interference-based SW filters.
The magnonic waveguide structure was fabricated from a 200 nm thick YIG film grown by liquid phase epitaxy on a gadolinium gallium garnet (GGG) substrate. Optical lithography followed by argon ion etching was used to pattern a stripe–ring configuration consisting of a 7.5 m-wide stripe connected to a ring of the same width and a 5 m inner radius. A 2 m-wide gold microstrip antenna was deposited on top of the stripe section to coherently excite SWs in the Backward Volume (BV, ) geometry. A schematic of the device layout and measurement configuration is shown in Fig. 1(a). Additionally, Fig. 1(b) shows micromagnetic simulations [19] of the -component of the effective magnetic field, for the longitudinally magnetised geometry with an applied external magnetic field of mT.222The simulation used a grid of and a cell dimension of 50 nm in all three dimensions. In the stripe section, the effective magnetic field distribution is homogeneous and matches the applied magnetic field. In contrast, within the ring section, demagnetising effects occur, which lead to local reductions and inhomogeneities of the effective magnetic field.

Furthermore, Fig. 1(c) shows the width-order-dependent dispersion relation of a longitudinally magnetised magnonic waveguide with a width of m in the BV geometry under an external magnetic field of mT. Due to lateral confinement, the wavevector component across the width is quantised as , where denotes the mode order. This dispersion relation defines the set of SW modes that can, in principle, be excited in the stripe section. The spectrum spans a broad frequency range, with the ferromagnetic resonance (FMR) mode located around 3.92 GHz. The analytical expression used for these calculations is provided in the supplementary material.
A discussion of the experiments in the Damon–Eshbach (DE, ) geometry can also be found in the supplementary material.
SW propagation was experimentally probed using super-Nyquist-sampling magneto-optical Kerr effect microscopy (SNS-MOKE) [20, 8, 21] and micro-focused Brillouin light scattering (-BLS) [22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31]. SNS-MOKE is a modified version of time-resolved magneto-optical Kerr effect microscopy (TR-MOKE) [32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37], which enables spatially resolved detection of both amplitude and phase of the dynamic out-of-plane magnetisation component . -BLS provides complimentary access to the SW spectrum by analysing thermally or coherently excited magnons through inelastic light scattering. A more detailed description of the experimental setups can be found in the supplementary material.
II Experimental results
All the following measurements were carried out in the BV geometry. Figs. 2(a)-(d) show spatial Kerr maps recorded by SNS-MOKE at different excitation frequencies, with an external magnetic field of mT applied along the YIG stripe. For each excitation frequency, two spatial maps are provided. The left column displays the absolute precessional amplitude where and are the in-phase and out-of-phase components of the lock-in detection signal. These components correspond directly to the real and imaginary parts of the dynamic out-of-plane magnetisation component, , thus providing a full description of the SW amplitude. The right column visualises the SW phase in terms of where . To improve clarity, the phase information is shown only within the device area, as defined by the topographic image, since regions outside exhibit random fluctuations in the absence of SWs.

First, we discuss the propagation profiles of the detected amplitude and phase maps. In Fig. 2(a), the SW amplitude decays along the YIG stripe, barely reaching the ring and with no pronounced amplitude beyond it. The phase map shows a short wavelength in the stripe. Several wavefronts are visible inside the ring, and a faint wavefront signature appears beyond the ring.
At an excitation frequency of GHz (Fig. 2(b)), plane wavefronts with a longer wavelength propagate along the YIG stripe towards the ring section. Scattering occurs at the transition into the ring, exciting caustic-like features [38, 39, 40, 41, 42] that reflect back and forth along nearly the entire ring. A sharp amplitude drop appears at the second ring junction (m). The phase map reveals complex wavefronts within the ring. Beyond the ring, amplitude is largely absent, though the phase map may indicate a weak transmitted wave.
At GHz (Fig. 2(c)), amplitude is observed up to and inside the ring, with a long-wavelength phase pattern. Caustic-like features appear again, now with different beam directions and reflection angles extending into the stripe. Reduced amplitude is observed in the intermediate regions of the ring and stripe. In contrast to the previous cases, a clear amplitude signal is visible beyond the ring, suggesting that transmission along the waveguide depends on the excitation frequency.
At GHz (Fig. 2(d)), a nodal structure across the width of the YIG stripe is observed, pointing to the excitation of higher-order width modes [31, 43, 44, 45]. No transmission beyond the ring is visible.
To assess the frequency-dependent transmission beyond the ring observed in Figs. 2(a)–(d), we evaluated whether the suppression of propagation can be explained solely by the intrinsic attenuation length of the SWs. For this analysis, line profiles of the precession amplitude were extracted by averaging over three lines along the centre of the stripe. The region before the ring was fitted with an exponential decay of the form
Here, denotes the amplitude, and the attenuation length. The dashed lines in Fig. 2(a) illustrate the extraction process, where the red and blue dashed lines indicate the regions before and beyond the ring, respectively.
The resulting profiles are shown in Fig. 3(a), where the amplitude is plotted on a logarithmic scale. The red dotted line corresponds to the extracted profile from the stripe section before the ring, and the blue dotted line shows the profile beyond the ring. The solid red line represents the exponential fit to the pre-ring region.

At excitation frequencies, GHz and GHz (top and bottom panels), the absence of amplitude beyond the ring is consistent with the expected exponential decay. At GHz (second panel), the behaviour deviates. Within the junction region where the stripe and ring merge, the amplitude approximately follows the exponential trend, but local variations are present, which suggest interference of SWs. Beyond the ring, the amplitude drops sharply, deviating significantly from the exponential decay. This indicates that damping alone cannot explain the lack of transmission at this frequency. Moreover, since the suppression occurs at the second junction, it cannot be attributed solely to scattering into the ring arm either, as this process should be symmetric at both junctions. At GHz (third panel), a clear amplitude signal is detected beyond the ring, consistent with the exponential decay fitted in the stripe, suggesting that magnon-magnon interaction barely affects the transmitted SW. Within the junction, the signal is partially reduced. Taken together, these observations indicate that transmission is not solely determined by intrinsic damping, but also by interference and scattering between SW modes within the ring and at the stripe–ring junctions.
To further investigate the influence of the ring structure on SW propagation and interference, we performed a spatial Fourier transform (FT) of the wavefront maps, separately analysing the stripe and ring sections. The FT data essentially yields a representation of the experimental iso-frequency curves in this region. For each excitation frequency, FT data were extracted from the stripe section within the grey dashed contour and from the ring section within the green dashed contour in Fig. 2(b).
In the stripe section, predominantly a single SW mode is observed. The corresponding extracted wavenumbers are plotted in Fig. 1(c). The FT data for 3.52 GHz, 3.76ĠHz and 3.92 GHz align well with the width mode, while the data at 4.00 GHz match the width mode, confirming the excitation of higher-order transverse modes [31, 43, 44, 45].
In contrast, the FT spectra in the ring section, shown in Fig. 3(b), reveal multiple SW modes. The FT spectra are compared to analytically calculated iso-frequency contours based on the Kalinikos–Slavin (KS) model for SWs in soft ferromagnetic thin films [46]. The calculations were performed for an external magnetic field of mT and are shown as dotted cyan lines. The experimental data show good agreement with the model, indicating that the incident stripe mode scatters into several modes within the ring, governed by the anisotropic in-plane dispersion relation.
The presence of these multiple modes can contribute to the suppression of transmission through two mechanisms. First, interference between the scattered modes within the confined geometry of the ring can lead to destructive interference and local amplitude suppression. Second, the directionality of SW propagation further hampers transmission. Due to stationary group velocity directions imposed by the anisotropic dispersion, SWs travel along fixed angles, forming caustic-like trajectories that undergo multiple internal reflections without efficient out-coupling [38, 39, 40, 41, 42]. Additionally, demagnetising effects in the ring lead to local reductions and spatial inhomogeneities in the effective magnetic field (cf. Fig. 1(b)), causing further variation in the local dispersion relation and adding complexity to SW behaviour in this region.
Furthermore, the excited wavenumbers in the ring are discrete, as seen most clearly at GHz and GHz, where strong amplitude signals are present in Fig. 3(b). This discretisation aligns well with the transverse width eigenmodes of the ring. Red dotted circles in Fig.3(b) indicate these eigenmodes, calculated as , with m and . These circles coincide with the discrete FT features, indicating that the finite ring width imposes additional confinement. Consequently, the SWs permitted within the ring are determined by the convolution of the dispersion relation with the ring’s width eigenmodes.
In summary, the frequency filtering observed in this system does not arise from simple phase accumulation of a single wave mode. Instead, multiple SW modes are excited within the ring, leading to frequency-dependent interference and directionally trapped propagation. The resulting transmission is shaped by the anisotropic dispersion relation, geometric confinement of the propagation spectrum (cf. Fig. 3(b)), and local field inhomogeneities (cf. Fig. 1(b)), all of which impose strong mode selection within the ring.
Further SNS-MOKE measurements at different excitation frequencies were performed to assess the transmission properties of the ring. In this context, regions A, J, and B were defined, as illustrated in the topography image in Fig.1(a). Averaging the amplitude over these rectangular regions provides a measure of the experimental SW amplitude before, at, and after the ring junction. The results for various frequencies are presented in Fig.4(a). The small red dots indicate the extrapolated values at the centres of regions A, J, and B, obtained from the exponential fit to the stripe section before the ring (cf. Fig. 3(a)).

The SW amplitude varies with excitation frequency across different device regions. In region A, the amplitude is low for excitation frequencies below GHz. As the frequency increases, the amplitude gradually rises. A sharp dip occurs at GHz, followed by a strong increase to a maximum at GHz. Beyond this point, the amplitude rapidly decreases. The experimental values closely follow the extrapolated amplitudes from the exponential fit.
In region J, the amplitude also increases with frequency, showing a pronounced dip near GHz and peaking at GHz. The relatively large error bars in this region indicate complex interference patterns at the junction. The extrapolated amplitudes show generally good agreement with the experimental data, though they tend to slightly overestimate the measured values, particularly at GHz.
Region B exhibits different behaviour compared to regions A and J. Beyond the ring, little to no amplitude is detected for frequencies below GHz. At GHz, a sharp transmission peak is observed, rapidly falling off afterwards, exhibiting some amplitude at GHz, but no amplitude beyond. The extrapolated amplitudes from the exponential fit predict sizable values between GHz and GHz. However, this prediction contrasts with the experimental results, which show no detectable amplitude in this frequency range.
Overall, this highlights the system’s sharp frequency selectivity, with a clear transmission peak at GHz, while other frequency bands exhibit strong attenuation beyond the ring. As previously discussed, the suppression of transmission likely results from interference and scattering among multiple SW modes, similar to the simulations by Odintsov et al. [15], rather than from simple phase accumulation along the ring.
Since the interfering modes depend on both frequency and magnetic field, the transmission properties should be tunable by adjusting external parameters. To test this, additional -BLS measurements were performed at an external magnetic field of mT. The -BLS spectra were acquired at the centres of regions A, J, and B (cf. Fig. 1(a)). The results are presented in Fig. 4(b), showing the normalised amplitude of the anti-Stokes peak of the coherent SW excitations. Further details on the -BLS measurements and data analysis are provided in the supplementary material.
Similar to the SNS data, position A shows a relatively broad SW spectrum, although it appears less continuous than in previous measurements. At position J, a sharp but weak peak is observed at GHz. More importantly, a clear transmission peak is detected at position B, now shifted to GHz compared to the 3.92 GHz peak observed at mT. This frequency shift demonstrates that the transmission characteristics can be tuned by varying the external magnetic field.
III Conclusion
We have experimentally investigated SW transmission in a micrometre-scale, ring-shaped magnonic resonator integrated with a linear YIG stripe. SNS-MOKE and -BLS spectroscopy was used to study SW behaviour in the BV geometry. In the stripe section, primarily a single SW mode was observed, whereas in the ring section, multiple modes emerged and were quantised due to the finite width of the waveguide. Demagnetising effects near and within the ring further modified the local effective magnetic field and influenced SW propagation.
Our results demonstrate that the observed frequency selectivity cannot be explained by a simple exponential decay due to damping or an accumulated phase of a single mode. Instead, transmission is governed by interference between multiple SW modes, shaped by the anisotropic dispersion relation, geometric confinement, and local variations in the effective magnetic field within the ring. In addition, the anisotropy imposes fixed group velocity directions, giving rise to caustic-like propagation that further limits efficient out-coupling.
Spatially resolved SNS-MOKE measurements reveal a pronounced transmission peak at 3.92 GHz under an applied field of 74 mT. Additional -BLS measurements confirm that the position of the transmission peak can be tuned by varying the external magnetic field, demonstrating the feasibility of field-controlled frequency selectivity.
References
- [1] A. A. Serga, A. V. Chumak, and B. Hillebrands, “YIG magnonics,” J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys., vol. 43, p. 264002, June 2010.
- [2] M. Krawczyk and D. Grundler, “Review and prospects of magnonic crystals and devices with reprogrammable band structure,” J. Phys.: Condens. Matter, vol. 26, p. 123202, Mar. 2014.
- [3] A. V. Chumak, V. I. Vasyuchka, A. A. Serga, and B. Hillebrands, “Magnon spintronics,” Nat. Phys., vol. 11, p. 453–461, June 2015.
- [4] A. Barman, G. Gubbiotti, S. Ladak, A. O. Adeyeye, M. Krawczyk, J. Gräfe, C. Adelmann, S. Cotofana, A. Naeemi, V. I. Vasyuchka, B. Hillebrands, S. A. Nikitov, H. Yu, D. Grundler, A. V. Sadovnikov, A. A. Grachev, S. E. Sheshukova, J.-Y. Duquesne, M. Marangolo, G. Csaba, W. Porod, V. E. Demidov, S. Urazhdin, S. O. Demokritov, E. Albisetti, D. Petti, R. Bertacco, H. Schultheiss, V. V. Kruglyak, V. D. Poimanov, S. Sahoo, J. Sinha, H. Yang, M. Münzenberg, T. Moriyama, S. Mizukami, P. Landeros, R. A. Gallardo, G. Carlotti, J.-V. Kim, R. L. Stamps, R. E. Camley, B. Rana, Y. Otani, W. Yu, T. Yu, G. E. W. Bauer, C. Back, G. S. Uhrig, O. V. Dobrovolskiy, B. Budinska, H. Qin, S. van Dijken, A. V. Chumak, A. Khitun, D. E. Nikonov, I. A. Young, B. W. Zingsem, and M. Winklhofer, “The 2021 magnonics roadmap,” J. Phys.: Condens. Matter, vol. 33, p. 413001, Aug. 2021.
- [5] A. V. Chumak, P. Kabos, M. Wu, C. Abert, C. Adelmann, A. O. Adeyeye, J. Akerman, F. G. Aliev, A. Anane, A. Awad, C. H. Back, A. Barman, G. E. W. Bauer, M. Becherer, E. N. Beginin, V. A. S. V. Bittencourt, Y. M. Blanter, P. Bortolotti, I. Boventer, D. A. Bozhko, S. A. Bunyaev, J. J. Carmiggelt, R. R. Cheenikundil, F. Ciubotaru, S. Cotofana, G. Csaba, O. V. Dobrovolskiy, C. Dubs, M. Elyasi, K. G. Fripp, H. Fulara, I. A. Golovchanskiy, C. Gonzalez-Ballestero, P. Graczyk, D. Grundler, P. Gruszecki, G. Gubbiotti, K. Guslienko, A. Haldar, S. Hamdioui, R. Hertel, B. Hillebrands, T. Hioki, A. Houshang, C.-M. Hu, H. Huebl, M. Huth, E. Iacocca, M. B. Jungfleisch, G. N. Kakazei, A. Khitun, R. Khymyn, T. Kikkawa, M. Klaui, O. Klein, J. W. Klos, S. Knauer, S. Koraltan, M. Kostylev, M. Krawczyk, I. N. Krivorotov, V. V. Kruglyak, D. Lachance-Quirion, S. Ladak, R. Lebrun, Y. Li, M. Lindner, R. Macedo, S. Mayr, G. A. Melkov, S. Mieszczak, Y. Nakamura, H. T. Nembach, A. A. Nikitin, S. A. Nikitov, V. Novosad, J. A. Otalora, Y. Otani, A. Papp, B. Pigeau, P. Pirro, W. Porod, F. Porrati, H. Qin, B. Rana, T. Reimann, F. Riente, O. Romero-Isart, A. Ross, A. V. Sadovnikov, A. R. Safin, E. Saitoh, G. Schmidt, H. Schultheiss, K. Schultheiss, A. A. Serga, S. Sharma, J. M. Shaw, D. Suess, O. Surzhenko, K. Szulc, T. Taniguchi, M. Urbanek, K. Usami, A. B. Ustinov, T. van der Sar, S. van Dijken, V. I. Vasyuchka, R. Verba, S. V. Kusminskiy, Q. Wang, M. Weides, M. Weiler, S. Wintz, S. P. Wolski, and X. Zhang, “Advances in magnetics roadmap on spin-wave computing,” IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 58, p. 1–72, June 2022.
- [6] B. Flebus, D. Grundler, B. Rana, Y. Otani, I. Barsukov, A. Barman, G. Gubbiotti, P. Landeros, J. Akerman, U. Ebels, P. Pirro, V. E. Demidov, K. Schultheiss, G. Csaba, Q. Wang, F. Ciubotaru, D. E. Nikonov, P. Che, R. Hertel, T. Ono, D. Afanasiev, J. Mentink, T. Rasing, B. Hillebrands, S. V. Kusminskiy, W. Zhang, C. R. Du, A. Finco, T. van der Sar, Y. K. Luo, Y. Shiota, J. Sklenar, T. Yu, and J. Rao, “The 2024 magnonics roadmap,” J. Phys.: Condens. Matter, vol. 36, p. 363501, June 2024.
- [7] H. Yu, O. d’ Allivy Kelly, V. Cros, R. Bernard, P. Bortolotti, A. Anane, F. Brandl, F. Heimbach, and D. Grundler, “Approaching soft x-ray wavelengths in nanomagnet-based microwave technology,” Nat Commun, vol. 7, Apr. 2016.
- [8] H. Qin, R. B. Holländer, L. Flajšman, F. Hermann, R. Dreyer, G. Woltersdorf, and S. van Dijken, “Nanoscale magnonic fabry-pérot resonator for low-loss spin-wave manipulation,” Nat Commun, vol. 12, Apr. 2021.
- [9] N. Zenbaa, C. Abert, F. Majcen, M. Kerber, R. O. Serha, S. Knauer, Q. Wang, T. Schrefl, D. Suess, and A. V. Chumak, “A universal inverse-design magnonic device,” Nature Electronics, Jan. 2025.
- [10] K.-S. Lee and S.-K. Kim, “Conceptual design of spin wave logic gates based on a mach–zehnder-type spin wave interferometer for universal logic functions,” J. Appl. Phys., vol. 104, p. 053909, Sept. 2008.
- [11] T. Goto, T. Yoshimoto, B. Iwamoto, K. Shimada, C. A. Ross, K. Sekiguchi, A. B. Granovsky, Y. Nakamura, H. Uchida, and M. Inoue, “Three port logic gate using forward volume spin wave interference in a thin yttrium iron garnet film,” Sci. Rep., vol. 9, Nov. 2019.
- [12] Á. Papp, W. Porod, and G. Csaba, “Nanoscale neural network using non-linear spin-wave interference,” Nat Commun, vol. 12, Nov. 2021.
- [13] D. G. Rabus, Integrated Ring Resonators. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2007.
- [14] G. Venkat, D. Venkateswarlu, R. S. Joshi, M. Franchin, H. Fangohr, P. S. Anil Kumar, and A. Prabhakar, “Enhanced spin wave propagation in magnonic rings by bias field modulation,” AIP Advances, vol. 8, Dec. 2017.
- [15] S. A. Odintsov, E. N. Beginin, S. E. Sheshukova, and A. V. Sadovnikov, “Reconfigurable lateral spin-wave transport in a ring magnonic microwaveguide,” JETP Lett., vol. 110, p. 430–435, Sept. 2019.
- [16] Q. Wang, A. Hamadeh, R. Verba, V. Lomakin, M. Mohseni, B. Hillebrands, A. V. Chumak, and P. Pirro, “A nonlinear magnonic nano-ring resonator,” npj Comput. Mater., vol. 6, Dec. 2020.
- [17] M. Iwaba and K. Sekiguchi, “Spin-wave enhancement using feedback-ring structure,” Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., vol. 62, p. 103001, Oct. 2023.
- [18] S. Odintsov, S. Sheshukova, S. Nikitov, and A. Sadovnikov, “Lateral and vertical spin-wave transport in a multimode magnonic ring coupler,” Phys. Rev. Applied, vol. 22, July 2024.
- [19] A. Vansteenkiste, J. Leliaert, M. Dvornik, M. Helsen, F. Garcia-Sanchez, and B. V. Waeyenberge, “The design and verification of MuMax3,” AIP Advances, vol. 4, p. 107133, Oct. 2014.
- [20] R. Dreyer, N. Liebing, E. R. J. Edwards, A. Müller, and G. Woltersdorf, “Spin wave localization and guiding by magnon band structure engineering in yttrium iron garnet,” 2018.
- [21] R. Dreyer, A. F. Schäffer, H. G. Bauer, N. Liebing, J. Berakdar, and G. Woltersdorf, “Imaging and phase-locking of non-linear spin waves,” Nat Commun, vol. 13, Aug. 2022.
- [22] D. Fioretto, G. Carlotti, L. Palmieri, G. Socino, L. Verdini, and A. Livi, “Structural relaxation in polymeric films studied by brillouin light spectroscopy,” Physical Review B, vol. 47, p. 15286–15289, June 1993.
- [23] B. Sermage and G. Fishman, “Resonant brillouin scattering of polaritons in znse: Heavy and light excitons,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 43, p. 1043–1046, Oct. 1979.
- [24] A. Borovik-Romanov and N. Kreines, “Brillouin-mandelstam scattering from thermal and excited magnons,” Physics Reports, vol. 81, p. 351–408, Jan. 1982.
- [25] D. R. Birt, K. An, A. Weathers, L. Shi, M. Tsoi, and X. Li, “Brillouin light scattering spectra as local temperature sensors for thermal magnons and acoustic phonons,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 102, Feb. 2013.
- [26] P. Djemia, C. Dugautier, T. Chauveau, E. Dogheche, M. I. De Barros, and L. Vandenbulcke, “Mechanical properties of diamond films: A comparative study of polycrystalline and smooth fine-grained diamonds by brillouin light scattering,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 90, p. 3771–3779, Oct. 2001.
- [27] S. Demokritov, “Brillouin light scattering studies of confined spin waves: linear and nonlinear confinement,” Physics Reports, vol. 348, p. 441–489, July 2001.
- [28] S. Demokritov and V. Demidov, “Micro-brillouin light scattering spectroscopy of magnetic nanostructures,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 44, p. 6–12, Jan. 2008.
- [29] T. Sebastian, K. Schultheiss, B. Obry, B. Hillebrands, and H. Schultheiss, “Micro-focused brillouin light scattering: imaging spin waves at the nanoscale,” Frontiers in Physics, vol. 3, June 2015.
- [30] V. E. Demidov, S. Urazhdin, E. R. J. Edwards, M. D. Stiles, R. D. McMichael, and S. O. Demokritov, “Control of magnetic fluctuations by spin current,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 107, Sept. 2011.
- [31] V. E. Demidov and S. O. Demokritov, “Magnonic waveguides studied by microfocus brillouin light scattering,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 51, p. 1–15, Apr. 2015.
- [32] K. Perzlmaier, G. Woltersdorf, and C. H. Back, “Observation of the propagation and interference of spin waves in ferromagnetic thin films,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 77, Feb. 2008.
- [33] M. Farle, T. Silva, and G. Woltersdorf, “Spin dynamics in the time and frequency domain,” in Springer Tracts in Modern Physics, pp. 37–83, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Sept. 2012.
- [34] Y. Au, T. Davison, E. Ahmad, P. S. Keatley, R. J. Hicken, and V. V. Kruglyak, “Excitation of propagating spin waves with global uniform microwave fields,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 98, p. 122506, Mar. 2011.
- [35] H. G. Bauer, J.-Y. Chauleau, G. Woltersdorf, and C. H. Back, “Coupling of spinwave modes in wire structures,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 104, p. 102404, Mar. 2014.
- [36] J. Stigloher, T. Taniguchi, H. Körner, M. Decker, T. Moriyama, T. Ono, and C. Back, “Observation of a goos-hänchen-like phase shift for magnetostatic spin waves,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 121, Sept. 2018.
- [37] F. Vilsmeier, C. Riedel, and C. H. Back, “Spatial control of hybridization-induced spin-wave transmission stop band,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 124, Mar. 2024.
- [38] A. V. Vashkovskii, A. V. Stal’makhov, and D. G. Shakhnazaryan, “Formation, reflection, and refraction of magnetostatic wave beams,” Soviet Physics Journal, vol. 31, p. 908–915, Nov. 1988.
- [39] A. Wartelle, F. Vilsmeier, T. Taniguchi, and C. H. Back, “Caustic spin wave beams in soft thin films: Properties and classification,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 107, Apr. 2023.
- [40] V. E. Demidov, S. O. Demokritov, D. Birt, B. O’Gorman, M. Tsoi, and X. Li, “Radiation of spin waves from the open end of a microscopic magnetic-film waveguide,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 80, July 2009.
- [41] T. Schneider, A. A. Serga, A. V. Chumak, C. W. Sandweg, S. Trudel, S. Wolff, M. P. Kostylev, V. S. Tiberkevich, A. N. Slavin, and B. Hillebrands, “Nondiffractive subwavelength wave beams in a medium with externally controlled anisotropy,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 104, May 2010.
- [42] C. Riedel, T. Taniguchi, L. Körber, A. Kákay, and C. H. Back, “Hybridization-induced spin-wave transmission stop band within a 1d diffraction grating,” Advanced Physics Research, vol. 2, Feb. 2023.
- [43] T. Brächer, O. Boulle, G. Gaudin, and P. Pirro, “Creation of unidirectional spin-wave emitters by utilizing interfacial dzyaloshinskii-moriya interaction,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 95, Feb. 2017.
- [44] A. V. Chumak, “Fundamentals of magnon-based computing,” 2019.
- [45] T. Taniguchi, J. Sahliger, F. Vilsmeier, and C. H. Back, “Width-mode order dependent spin wave conversion in an in-plane magnetized microscale t-shaped yig magnonic splitter,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 135, June 2024.
- [46] B. A. Kalinikos and A. N. Slavin, “Theory of dipole-exchange spin wave spectrum for ferromagnetic films with mixed exchange boundary conditions,” J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys., vol. 19, pp. 7013–7033, Dec. 1986.